January 7, 2008...1:50 pm

Who killed Benazir….

Jump to Comments

It is too late to write about the assasination of the ‘Daughter of the East’ Benazir Bhutto but an article in the’Washington Post’ forced me to think about it. There are many theories taking rounds about how she did she actually die?
1. Javed Iqbal Cheema the ‘spokesman’ of the Ministry of Interior of Pakistan said- Benazir hit her head on the ‘lever’ of the sunroof of her Toyota Land Cruiser SUV as she “dug down”. She hit her head on the side of the sunroof when she ducked to save herself from the exploding suicide bomb — and killed herself by herself.
2. “Bhutto’s personal secretary Naheed Khan and party official Makhdoom Amin Fahim said “Two bullets hit her, one in the abdomen and one in the head.”
3. Baitullah Masoud of ‘Al- Quaida’ is responsible according to another version of the Pakistani government.
The modus operandi is not the only important thing, the cause of this gruesome murder is equally important. There was a report in the Washington Post under the heading- ‘US brokered Bhutto’s return to Pakistan’.“For Benazir Bhutto, the decision to return to Pakistan was sealed during a telephone call from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice just a week before Bhutto flew home in October. The call culminated more than a year of secret diplomacy . . .” Her call was made to Benazir in Dubai. “A week later, on October 18, Bhutto returned.
According to the report, President General Pervez Musharraf’s control of his government ended when he led the confrontation with the chief justice of the Supreme Court. After that Bhutto became the only politician who might have helped keep him in power. Imran Khan in his news conference soon after Bhutto’s death said something to the same effect. Mrs. Bhutto was very vocal in attacking Musharraf Government. She was always seen as being pro-American. She signed her own death certificate. You don’t attack others if you are not in the postion to defend yourself. According to Asif Ali Zardari after the first suicide bombing she had sent messages to the western governments. She wanted them to force Mussharaf to provide extra security for her. He didn’t oblige and the the result is for everybody to see. Her pursuit of power brought her back although she knew very well that the Americans could not guarantee her life. There was an attack on her the day she returned and ten weeks later she was murdered. The western governments have to share the blame of her murder for using her for their own interests and not providing enough security. Her political fate should have been determined by the people of Pakistan, not by George W. Bush or Pervez Musharraf. American Ambassador Anne W. Patterson and British High Commissioner Robert Brinkley were seen calling on Benazir Bhutto and other Pakistani politicians  frequently and pressing them to participate in the  election process.  Saudi Arabia  played an active role in Pakistani politics during the Nawaz Sharif exile and deportation incidents.  Unfortunately her death is being investigated by Scotland yard and not Pakistan’s own investigative agencies. Jinnah created Pakistan because he was apprehensive about Hindus  dominating the minorities. He must be tossing and turning in his grave to see so many outsiders controlling the sovereign state he created.

19 Comments

  • My best bet would be that she fell victim to her own greed and Gluttony! She was basically an anarchist and her decision to make her son her political hair further solidifies the fact.

    I regret that bhutto is dead,Iam sad,Iam angry,Iam demoralized but all this is not because I respected Bhutto as a leader.It is because she has gone without being held accountable for her actions,Many people died due to her greed ,Why don’t we lament those guys ? why dont we cry over the billions of tax payer money spent to buy the surrey castle ? why ?

    Its bout time that we stop romanticizing our dead and see things as they actually stand!

    Nice research though! :)

  • @ shine87 I am not sure if the decision to anoint Bilawal as a heir is a very happy decision for Bilawal himself.He has to leave his carefree life in London with all the money his parents have accumulated over yhe years.About being corrupt- if not Bhutto then who? Nawaz Sharif is as corrupt as Mohotarma was. The only scare could be Mr 10% who claims to be the Pakistani version of Sonia Gandhi. Imran Khan hasn’t proved to be very successful. After a couple of elections all he could win is his own seat.MQM’s policies are also under the scanner after that Karachi mayhem when Justice Chowdhry visited Karachi.The religious parties are not acceptable to most moderates. In politics on has to make choices from the people available. You can’t afford vaccums in politics.

  • You are right about the vaccume,we cant afford to have that.But you are wrong about Imran khan according to IRI (International Republican Institute) His party is the fastest growing one in Pakistan.Iam by no means politically inclined towards Tehreek-e-insaaf because i know that only Imran khan cant do anything because his party is filled with scum bags who are just as corrupt as Benazir and Nawaz-not-so-Sharif,But I hope for the future, I chose to believe that we the youth can make a difference, we can steer any party to fulfill the objectives we set our minds on.And such optimism springs from the Recent chief Justice Fiasco.I attended two of his rallies when he came to Peshawar and i observed that people are getting very politically aware.The difference of opinions I saw(All equally logical) points to the fact that the youth has actually started taking an interest in the country and that i tell you is the starting point of change! :)

    As far as Bilawal is concerned i would not comment because i do not know the guy well enough yet,but i have observed that he has started his political journey with thoughts of revenge and that can rarely lead to any good!

  • As far as I understood Bilawal was talking about revenge through democracy which is an honourable thing to do.You are absolutely right when you talk about ‘hope for the future.’About Imran Khan he may be a good person but you need party workers to be successful in an election. He may be the future but it is too early for him to make a difference to the political scene.

  • revenge in any form can’t be honourable,Didnt the Great man Mahatma Gandhi tought us all that? :)

  • Bilawal’s describing of democracy as revenge shows that the Bhutto concept of democracy is ‘dynastic fiefdom’ and not the purist definition of Abraham Lincoln.

    If sufficient people in Pakistan are not outraged enough to take control of their own destiny and to agree on a leader who can lead satisfactorily, they have only themselves to blame. The rest can only observe and discuss till the cows come home.

    Freedom comes at a price; and thereon one has to protect it. Sixty years on, perhaps the people of Pakistan need a rethink.

  • BB had more supporters then those who disliked her or her politics. And among those who disliked her the majority consists of the people who fell for the negative propaganda sponsored by the Agencies and jealous politicians, dictators who could neither match her genius nor had equivalent support in the masses.

    If you tune into any Pakistani channel, you will hear Pakistani people; the poor, middle class, political analysts, poets and philosophers admiring the lady and her sacrifices for this country.

    This love and admiration proves one thing n one thing alone that the majority of the Pakistanis want peace, stability and democracy in the region.

    @ Shefaly

    Our country is in chaos alright. This chaos is of the same magnitude (maybe of different nature) when Indira, Sanjay and Rajeev Gandhi were assasinated. Despite of all the external and some internal pressures & problems we haven’t lost faith in Muhammed Ali Jinnahs Pakistan and the day is near when we will get their.

  • hmm…..that was mildly amusing,ill go make my self some coffee now!!!

  • Ammar, not only Pakistani channels international channels were all full of praise for Benazir Bhutto.At the same time when you talk of democracy you cannot take away the right to dissent.@shiny87 has a right to opinion.
    We hope for the best for Pakistan. The crisis that you are facing would soon be over inshallah.The world realises now that a stable Pakistan is in the interest of everybody.

  • Shefaly,
    You are right there is a price for freedom but 60 years is a long time, you never know what happens to which country in 6 decades.Before the 2nd world war who could have imagined that Germany would be friends with America and Russians would be their enemies.

  • BB knew coming back to Pakistan was dangerous. She had the courage to come back to take part in the election. That’s something even her opponents can’t deny. Apart from “fate”, I think Musharraf is somehow guilty of not providing her with enough security (it was nobody else’s job, especially not foreign countries if BB didnt want to be called a puppet)

  • @ Ammar: The only chaos when Sanjay Gandhi died was in the Gandhi household. Many others rejoiced!

    He was a naive and foolhardy man who encouraged by his blinded-by-affection-and-need-to-cling-to-power mother did things that should have been unthinkable for a civilised man. Such as mandatory vasectomy for poor men. If unfettered, such things are not a million miles from a Hitler in the making.

    Crying over an assassination because the nation lost a PM is a different thing from crying over it because a clan lost the heir-apparent to the democratic throne.

  • http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1699877,00.html

  • it is not so much as to who killed her but who wanted her killed

    as ammaar says pakistan is in chaos and there can be many people wanting her dead and most likely it could be any one of them

    i have read reports of the sindhi disillusionment about the state moreso after the death of bhutto. they have punjabi dominence, the talebani mullahs, the sipah saleba on the other, the baluchi problem the pashtoon problem and now this one
    if things deteriorate will pak go into an internal civil war is the more practical question

  • Prax,I am sure Pakistan will be able to tide over this crisis.The stakes are too high for the world.Every nation has to endure difficult times.After world war 2 who could have imagined Japan would become one of the top economies of the world. After Nehru died we had a vaccum,Shastri came to the rescue.After Indira died Rajiv, inspite of his inexperience handled the situation and after Rajiv Narsimha Rao did the job.They will also find someone.

  • how can u compare indian democracy with paks islamocracy - its enshrined in their constitution

    on vacuums in india —???
    i dont think there was any vacuum
    there was vacuum in congress after rajeev’s death not before ..

  • Thanx for the support Pr3rna!

  • Ammar,I believe in whatever I said.
    Prax there is a famous quote by Atal Bihari Vajpayee when Nehru ji died and everybody felt the vaccum,he said’Bharat maa ki godh sooni hui hai kokh nahin’.Then after Shastriji died Indira Gandhi was made the prime minister although nobody believed in her. She was the ‘goongi gudiya’ then.The reason was after Shastri who? What I mean is that when a popular leader dies he is missed. We in India are fortunate to be a democracy because nothing else would have worked in a pluralistic society like ours.

  • Prerna: This will interest you.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article3175025.ece

Leave a Reply